Dianetics at the PNE

I went to the PNE last night, for the first time in a couple of years. Amongst the numerous vendors of household implements, cheap wallets and miracle stain removers at the marketplace were a few psychics, promising insight on your future, love life and financial situation for a modest fee. And, a Dianetics booth.

I went to the PNE last night, for the first time in a couple of years. Amongst the numerous vendors of household implements, cheap wallets and miracle stain removers at the marketplace were a few psychics, promising insight on your future, love life and financial situation for a modest fee. And, a Dianetics booth. The people there—who, it must be said, didn’t seem at all creepy or crazy—kept asking people if they wanted a stress test. I heroically resisted the urge to ask them how their pseudo-therapy was working on Tom Cruise.

One of my friends did get his palms read, purely for entertainment purposes. Which I considered doing myself, but I didn’t want to encourage the psychics by giving them my attention and money. (Mind you, I do occasionally buy the Weekly World News myself, when it has an especially outrageous cover story. The Garden of Eden being found in Colorado is one of my favourites. Apparently they even found two skeletons, one male and one female. Of course, the male skeleton was missing a rib!)

They printed out his chart—actually, two charts, one for the present and near future, one for the more distant future—which included some pretty diagrams of all the lines and regions on the hand, their connections to astrological signs and so on. His computer-generated scores in various areas of life (a) were really not that accurate, and (b) seemed to change more or less randomly between the two charts. But I guess the suckers who believe this stuff will assign special meaning to it anyways, ignore or forget the misses, and think they’ve spent their money wisely.

Three Missionary Tracts

There was a bit about sharing tracts in the old Rapture movie I reviewed a few days ago, (just about 6 minutes in) and that made me remember my own small collection of missionary tracts. I picked them all up one night many years ago, while waiting for the bus in downtown Vancouver. They were scattered all over the bus stop bench so I collected them (out of a dislike for littering, both physical and spiritual), and have kept them to this day (out of morbid curiosity and historical interest).

There was a bit about sharing tracts in the old Rapture movie I reviewed a few days ago, (just about 6 minutes in) and that made me remember my own small collection of missionary tracts. I picked them all up one night many years ago, while waiting for the bus in downtown Vancouver. They were scattered all over the bus stop bench so I collected them (out of a dislike for littering, both physical and spiritual), and have kept them to this day (out of morbid curiosity and historical interest). Incidentally, just how are tracts supposed to work, anyways? The scene in question in Are You Ready? shows the presentation of a tract leading to a joint reading and friendly discussion, but the reality is quite different: I actually saw a guy drop a couple of tracts off at a bus stop. He didn’t slow down, or look anyone in the eye, just threw his missionary litter down and kept on his way. I remarked to my then-roommate (who was also waiting for the bus) that the missionary guy didn’t look happy—his entire body language was very angry and defensive. I would have felt sorry for him, but I was busy throwing his tracts where they belonged: in the garbage.

Some of my tracts are fairly modern, and thus pretty forgettable. One’s about the Number of the Beast (666, naturellement) and how it’ll be imposed upon us by the Antichrist, and how this is a bad thing. One asks “Are You Free?” (answer: no, ’cos of all the sin). One asks “Will God Let You Into Heaven” (right, with no question mark. Anyway, the answer is: probably not). Another is about “The Horrors of Hell” (briefly: it’s pretty bad). Another, entitled “He Made The Coupling” is set in modern type but with old-fashioned language, used the metaphor of “coupling” between train cars to illustrate the “connection” between us and God. And also that alcohol is bad, mmkay. But three deserve special mention because they’re set with lovely old typeface and nicely old-fashioned language—turn of the century, I’d say—and tell interesting parables that provide a nice window into some Christians’ mindset, past and present.

“Nobody Ever Asked John To Come”

Nobody Every Asked John to Come

He was a blacksmith, and a most wretchedly wicked man. He knew everything that is blatant and blasphemous in infidelity. He hated everything that is good, and loved everything that is bad. He studied to make himself an irritation to all who believed in God, not even sparing his wife, who did the best she could in the patience and kingdom of Jesus. This man was given up as altogether beyond moral recovery, and so indeed he seemed. Prayer was made as though he had no existence; churches were opened and shut, but never with references to him; the Gospel was preached and mercy offered, but no one connected him with God’s message to the world.

Hello, Christian Stereotype Number One. Look, even the most antireligious atheists I’ve ever known don’t generally go out of their way to annoy Christians—though to some, just being openly godless is enough of an affront. Although I will say the bit about churches shutting him out is extremely plausible.

A few miles back in the country from this blacksmith’s town there lived an old couple, Father and Mother Brown. They were close to ninety years of age. Theirs had been lives of conscious acceptance with God and of patient, unremitting devotedness to Him; and they were waiting without sorrow and without fear for the promised home-coming.

And here’s Christian Stereotype Number Two. Aren’t they adorable? All together now: awwww. Note how black-and-white the world is in these tracts: Christians are totally faultless, non-Christians are complete monsters.

Anyway, one morning Father Brown wakes up all agitated and goes into town. His first stop is John’s blacksmith shop, to tell him about a dream he had.

Together they went into the shop, and when seated, the old man said: “John, I had a dream last night, and I’ve come to tell you about it. I dreamed that the hour I have thought about so much and tried to keep ready for so long was come. It was my time to die. And it was just like I thought it was going to be, for it was just as the Lord promised it should be. I wasn’t the least bit afraid. How could I be? My room was full of angels, and they all spoke to me, and I loved them and know[sic] they loved me. Then some of them stooped and slipped their arms under me, and away we went. Beyond the clouds we mounted thru[sic] the starry skies. Oh, how they sang! I never heard anything like it in my life. On we swept, and on till one of them said, ’Look yonder now; there is Heaven.’

Heaven, as seen in Father Brown’s dream, is pretty kickass. There’s music and singing and happiness and everybody welcomes him. He sees all his children. After a time, his wife is also brought in. There’s gladness and rejoicing until he notices that John the blacksmith isn’t in Heaven. So Brown goes and asks Jesus where John is.

“And O John, that you could have seen how sorry He was when He told me that you hadn’t come. And He wept, as I suppose He often did when He was down here, and told me, ‘Nobody ever asked John to come.’ Oh, I fell at His feet. I bathed them with my tears. I laid my cheeks upon them and cried: ‘Blessed Lord! just let me out of here an hour, and I’ll go and ask him to come. I’ll give him an invitation.’ And right then and there I woke up. It was beginning to get light in the east, and I was so glad I was alive, so I could come and ask you to go to Heaven: and now here I am and I have told you my dream, and want you to go.”

Father Brown trots out some more Bible verses while John listens unable to move, as if in a trance. Then he leaves; John tries to get on with work, but none of his equipment is working right.

“God, be merciful to me a sinner!” he began to sob at last, and leaving the shop, he went home. He told his wife of Father Brown’s visit. “Blessed be God!” she said. “We will send the horse and buggy and have him come back.” “Yes,” he added, “for I mean to accept the invitation, and I want him to pray to God to keep me true and steadfast to the end.”

And the tract concludes with a few more choice Bible verses.

Now, I don’t know about you, but if one of my Christian friends came to me babbling about some dream of Heaven and begging me to convert? I’d tell them to fuck right off, though maybe not in those exact words. Fortunately none of them have ever tried, although I have been witnessed to by strangers on a couple of occasions, in video arcades and at bus stops. Not to mention having read the Bible several times in two languages, and reading all flavours of Good News on the Web. Yes, I’ve heard of Jesus. Now leave me alone.

These missionary types seem to believe faith is bubbling just beneath the surface, waiting for the right Bible verse to erupt. And I’m sure they imagine they’ll be the one to do it, because their spiel is unique and special and not at all recycled pablum that their target has heard a thousand times before. They think they’re being helpful when really, they’re obnoxious pests. Because these naive missionaries, so hopped up on spreading the good word, have no fucking clue how other people think and feel.

This tract is actually the least offensive of the lot, and falls more in the “extremely irritating” category. There’s no mention of hell at all, which is pretty unusual for old-time missionary literature. And, fun question: it’s a good thing that everybody important to Father Brown was there in Heaven. What would have happened if he had really died before inviting John? Would he still have missed him? Ah, but then his happiness wouldn’t have been perfect. Maybe what happens is that you forget about all the people you knew, and all the ones you didn’t, who ended up in The Other Place. That way you don’t have to worry about empathising with eternally tormented souls.

Speaking of which…

48 Hours In Hell

Hey, does anybody else have Love & Rockets’ fourth (self-titled) album? One song on it, Bound For Hell, relates a dream of a hell-bound train filled with damned souls, and concludes with the narrator waking up horrified by what awaits him if he doesn’t fly straight. It looks like it was actually adapted from an old folk song (which also inspired a pretty freaky short story by Robert Bloch), but it’s exactly what you’d get if you put one of these hellfire tracts to music.

A number of years ago, in a penitentiary coal mine, God permitted an inmate miner to see some of the horrors of damnation. It made such an impression on him that, upon his return to earth, he not only believed in an old-fashion[sic] Bible Hell, but gave his heart to God to escape it.

This miner accidentally gets buried for several hours and, when found, seems quite dead. Burial preparations are made but when the “corpse” is carried to the coffin, one of the inmates trips over a cuspidor (i.e.: a spittoon. Yes, I had to look that up). The only-mostly-dead inmate hits his head on the floor, and miraculously wakes up.

The story (except for the concluding paragraphs) is narrated by a reporter—named “Mr. Reynolds” only at the very end—who somehow learns of these unusual events and gets the miner’s story, which he relates verbatim. (And maybe it’s just me, but it feels like an old-fashioned story structure. The only evidence I have for this is that H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine was written is that way.)

The miner was working down in the mine; suddenly there’s darkness, then an impression of “a great iron door” through which the miner passes. Then:

From some cause unknown to myself, I started to move away from the doorway, and had traveled some distance, when I came to the banks of a broad river. It was not dark, neither was it light. There was about as much light as on a bright star-lit night. I had not remained on the banks of this river very long until I could hear the sound of oars in the water, and soon a person in a boat rowed up to where I was standing. I was speechless. He looked at me for a moment and then said that he had come for me, and told me to get into the boat and row across to the other side.

(Nice Greek Underworld motif there. Except I believe Charon stands up in his boat and poles across the Acheron.)

On the opposite shore, the miner sees two roads: one broad and well-travelled, one narrow. He of course takes the well-travelled road, and meets a demon.

He resembled a man somewhat, but was much larger than any human being I ever saw. He must have been at least ten feet tall. He had great wings on his back. He was black as the coal I had been digging, and in a perfectly nude condition. He had a spear in his hand, the handle of which must have been fully fifteen feet in length. His eyes shone like balls of fire. His teeth, white as pearl, seemed fully an inch long. His nose, if you will call it a nose, was very large, broad and flat. His hair was very coarse, heavy and long.

The African-American demon guides him to another, similar, demon who announces Thou art in hell. Then—just to add insult to injury—the miner is granted a glimpse of Heaven before being cast into the Lake of Fire. There are flowers and singing and walls of jasper and angels and all sorts of lovely stuff. He sees his mother there, “who died a few years ago of a broken heart because of my wickedness.” He is then led through another door:

Just before me I could see, as far as eye could reach, that literal lake of fire and brimstone. Huge billows of fire would roll over each other, and great waves of fiery flame would dash against each other and leap high into the air like the waves of the sea during a violent storm. On the crest of the waves I could see human beings rise, but soon to be carried down again to the lowest depths of this awful lake of fire. When borne on the crests of these awful billows, for a time, their curses against a just God would be appalling, and their pitiful cries for water would be heart-rending. This vast region of fire echoed and re-echoed with the wails of those lost spirits.

Presently I turned my eyes to the door through which I had a few moments before entered, and I read these awful words This is thy doom. Eternity never ends.

Meh. It’s no Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate. Sidenote: until I reread this tract recently, I’d remembered the words on the door as “Eternity begins now.” Which I think would have been much cooler.

Just as the miner is falling into the lake, he wakes up, and vows never to enter Hell again. He’s seen both his reward and his punishment, and he’s giving his heart to God.

The miner was permitted to see Heaven and Hell just as he described them to Mr. Reynolds, which tallies wonderfully with the Bible description of each place—the home of the saints—the place of the damned.

Well, first of all, no it doesn’t. There’s no boatman or bat-winged demons mentioned in the Bible. Dante’s Inferno, yes, but not the Bible. And while the New Jerusalem (as mentioned in the Book of Revelation) does indeed have a river and foundations of jasper, there’s no mention of flowers or beautiful fragrances. (Though maybe that’s in the Paradiso, it’s been ages since I’ve read it.) Second, even ignoring these embellishments, near-death experiences are culture-specific, so of course this miner (if he weren’t fictional) would see images from the Christian afterlife, instead of, say, the Eater of Hearts.

Enough nitpicks. The real horror here is that, first, the writer is totally getting off on describing the screams and the torments, which he believes are literally real. So what am I, the reader, supposed to get out of it? Fear of eternal punishment? I admit, if I saw the Lake of Fire (outside of some near-death hallucination), I’m sure I’d scream and cry and soil myself just as if I’d rolled into Treblinka or Auschwitz. I’d probably beg and plead for mercy. But I wouldn’t wholeheartedly convert just because God is big and strong and can make me fry for a long time, or promises flowers and harps and all the best X-Box games if I behave. And when my pleas are ignored, you better believe I’d be cursing God too. Because only an infinitely cruel tyrant would sentence even one person, no matter how evil and depraved, to an eternity of torture. And only a morally deficient coward would call that justice or the act of a loving being, and get others to worship this monster. God created Hell, and decided the rules for who ends up there, so he’s ultimately responsible for the suffering in his fiery basement. But smug self-righteous Christians either don’t see that or don’t care; as long as they get to frolic with the angels when they die then everything’s peachy.

Cuff — A Negro Slave

Cuff - A Negro Slave

Cuff was a negro slave who lived in the South before the Civil War. He was a joyful Christian, and a faithful servant.

Times are hard, and his master sells him to an “infidel,” who vows to stop Cuff from praying. But Cuff says:

O Massa, I loves to pray to Jesus, and when I pray I loves you and Missus all the more, and can work all the harder for you.

Massa doesn’t like it, Cuff keeps praying and gets whipped, but still goes on working.

Meantime, God was working on the Master. He saw his wickedness and cruelty to that poor soul, whose only fault had been his fidelity, and conviction seized upon him. By night he was in great distress of mind.

Massa feels so bad that he thinks he’s dying. But he doesn’t want a doctor, he wants someone to pray for him because he’s afraid of going to hell. So they send for Cuff.

The master, groaning, said, “O Cuff, can you pray for me?”

“Yes, bless de Lord, Massa, I’se been prayin’ for you all night,” and then dropped on his knees, and, like Jacob of old, wrestled in prayer; and before the breaking of day witnessed the conversion of both master and mistress. Master and slave embraced, race differences and past cruelty were swept away by the love of God, and tears of joy were mingled.

Cuff is set free and the master goes out to preach the Gospel. The reader is asked not to resist our loving Saviour any longer. The End.

There. Wasn’t that heartwarming? Of course the characters are the same one-dimensional stereotypes we’ve seen before; the Christian is a meek and passive doormat who does nothing but obey his earthly and divine masters, while the “infidel” is an inhumanly cruel bastard who hates Christianity for no reason. And then, just as arbitrarily, repents of his misdeeds. Which begs the question of why God couldn’t have been “working on” the Master before he tortured that poor slave—and also begs the other question of where the Master’s free will was in all of this.

Story logic aside, there’s an extra dimension to this tract, which easily makes it the most disturbing in my collection, and that is its glorification of slavery: Cuff’s humble and helpless condition is held up as the ideal for Christians, something to inspire them. His sufferings aren’t depicted to show the inherent injustice of slavery, how wrong it is for one human being to own another and have complete power over them. No, we’re supposed to admire Cuff for his unconditional obedience, sweet childlike faith, and (most of all) contentment with his lot in life. This, along with his mangled English, makes Cuff very much a stereotypical Uncle Tom character. Images and stories like Cuff’s—along with many Bible-based arguments—served to justify or excuse slavery and, later, the Jim Crow laws. This attitude persists even today, though you’ll only see it displayed openly in some hardcore bigots such as Promise Keepers.

Apocalypse Then And Now

Exhibit A: an ancient, horribly low-budget film about the Rapture.

Exhibit B: They’re making a video game based on the Left Behind movies.

Exhibit A: an ancient, horribly low-budget film about the Rapture.

I guess what’s really shocking isn’t the bargain-basement production values, or the dull pacing, it’s the cheap and mundane fears being peddled. Maids going missing? Milk not delivered on time? A lot of open graves? All right, they get into rivers of blood and so on near the end, and the bit about vanishing doctors and train engineers is a bit worrying… but, you know, that could be avoided by forbidding born-again Christians from performing critical tasks since they could be raptured any time. “Do not operate heavy machinery while saved.” Which, by the way, raises the question: assuming for the moment it’s real, how many people will actually vanish during the Rapture? In other words, who are the Real Christians™? Well, even the self-identified born-again can’t agree on that one; but the requirements must be pretty harsh, so the number of raptured people is probably small. I’ll just guess offhand they’re mostly—though not exclusively—in the Bible Belt, rural, on average less educated (not many heart surgeons, then). And they’d tend to cluster, so whole communities would be carried off together. Here in Canada I guess we’d lose… Abbotsford? Meh, I can live with that.

The film continues with more tales of Sugarcandy Mountain, about how wonderful it’ll be to fly through the air away from from the woes of this world, heartache and war and icky unbelievers. But the way they blame Christians for the sufferings of unbelievers who are doomed to live through the Tribulation (and could have been reached if only you the viewer had witnessed just a little bit harder) is frankly sick. Just what fundie nuts need: in addition to fear of God and fear of the Devil, now they’ve got to deal with the guilt that rightfully belongs to their so-called loving deity as he maims and smites.

Digging around I found another film by this guy, helpfully explaining why we need Christ’s loving dynamite to turn our hearts to manure, which will then undergo nuclear fusion. Or something. I may have tuned out a couple of times.

Exhibit B: They’re making a video game based on the Left Behind movies.

I saw a few minutes of the first Left Behind movie years ago (the bit where every True Xian™ vanishes, leaving their clothes and possessions behind), then I changed the channel. What was the point? I’d read the Book of Revelation, I knew how the story was going to play out. Although I guess the Bible didn’t have some tragically hunky reporter witnessing the last days. (Well, sorta hunky. I used to think Kirk Cameron was soooo hot, back in the day. Now? Not so much.) But underneath the special effects, it’s just the same warmed-over crap. And now that crap becomes interactive. Wheee.

Honestly, who believes this can work as a conversion tool? What will people learn about Xianity, except that it involves fighting the United Nations and racking up points for saving souls? Or is it just aimed at paranoid fundies so they can live out their end-of-the-world fantasies?

The sad thing is, there are people who take this stuff very seriously. In 1941, the prophecies were “not far from fulfillment” (no doubt because of World War II). Sixty-five years later, some people are still insisting the Apocalypse is almost at hand. Fifty years from now, sadly, I’m sure there’ll be more wars and famines and plagues for fundies to get excited about. I wish I could be witty about this, but really it’s just depressing. Millenial fundies really get turned on by wars and calamities, because it’s clear they hate this world and want it gone. Other people’s sufferings are not real to these loons, just a sign that they’ll get their reward. It’s just monstrously selfish.

Exhibit C: George W. Bush himself and his creepy fundie crowd. I’ll just let that speak for itself.

Tofino and Back

Last week I had friends visit from Ottawa (not just to see me, tho: they’ve gone on an Alaskan cruise) and we spent a few days in Tofino. I picked them up at the airport Monday evening, and we headed down to Tsawwassen to take the Victoria ferry. We spent most of Tuesday traveling across the island; we could have done it in a few hours, but why rush? There was so much to see on the way.

Last week I had friends visit from Ottawa (not just to see me, tho: they’ve gone on an Alaskan cruise) and we spent a few days in Tofino. I picked them up at the airport Monday evening, and we headed down to Tsawwassen to take the Victoria ferry. We spent most of Tuesday traveling across the island; we could have done it in a few hours, but why rush? There was so much to see on the way.

Saanich Inlet

In Duncan, we stopped at the Quw’utsun’ Cultural Centre, where we looked at some totem poles and watched an interesting short film on the Cowichan people’s history and culture. Petroglyph Park was a bit of a disappointment, though—maybe I didn’t look in the right places, but the glyphs just weren’t that visible. it’s possible I was expecting big showy art like Cro-Magnon cave paintings. Oh, well; maybe I’ll give it (or other petroglyph sites on Vancouver Island) another go if I’m ever in the area again. Everything else about our trip across the island was stunning, though, from the big mountains to the serene lakes to the little creeks bubbling merrily by the highway.

Wally Creek

We stayed at the Pacific Sands resort, right by Cox Bay Beach. I took a walk on the beach that night, away from the resort, and was struck by the dizzying and awesome sight of the night sky crowded with stars. Equally awesome: the roaring blackness that was the Pacific, broken only by the foam on top of the waves, faintly reflecting the light from the resort. Having lived in cities all my life, I found such complete darkness disorienting and more than a little scary.

On Wednesday morning we took a walk on the beach at low tide and goggled at the stunning critters we found. There were big gorgeous starfish, several kinds of sea anemones, mussels, barnacles and more. I’d only thought about tides in the abstract, caused by the motion of the sun and the moon, but here it was real: there was the intertidal zone, covered in barnacles and mussels. This was nature, not in a zoo; powerful, untamed, dangerous and fascinating.

Pretty Starfish

Then, whale watching! We’d heard that gray whales had been sighted feeding in the area, so decided it was worth the risk of seasickness. I took lots of pictures of the nearby islands as we went past them, for reference. I think in the back of my mind I wanted to piece together a map of the area, and match island names with their actual appearance. But when I sorted through the pictures later, they pretty much all looked like nondescript rocks rising from the sea. Oh well. I did get a couple of pretty good shots of a gray whale. I was lucky to even get those, because as big as those creatures are (up to 15m), they’re very small compared to the very big Pacific Ocean. Most of the time all I could see was their spout in the distance.

Gray Whale

The best part was, I didn’t get seasick (though I got pretty worried the first time we cut engines to watch for whales). The credit goes to the two Gravols I took, and also to my always being on my feet and adjusting for the motion of the boat. In fact, I deliberately tried to imagine I was the one controlling the rocking, which I think helped even more. On the way back, the wind picked up and the waves got even worse. But I stayed abovedecks, even though I wore only a t-shirt and light jacket, because I knew if I went below I’d have a much better chance of being sick. I preferred to freeze, endure the wind and the spray (like needles on my face, it was!), than share my lunch with the fishes.

More Pounding Waves

Before docking we passed by a bald eagle’s nest on one of the little islands between Tofino and Meares Island, but it was too far for me to get a clear picture. That’s okay, though: I saw lots of bald eagles (another first for me) soaring majestically around the area.

We started back on Thursday, stopping to explore a couple of trails south of Long Beach, ending up in a little sheltered cove. My inner scientist perked right up, because it made an interesting contrast with Cox Bay Beach. Now, Cox Bay is a sandy beach, very exposed, with no (or very few) off-shore rocks. It has life, but only the kind of life that can hang on to bare rock and endure the strong tides: barnacles, mussels, anemones, starfish. This little cove, on the other hand, was a gravelly beach, and turned out to have much richer life in its tide pools: everything we saw on Cox Bay, plus little fishies, tiny little crabs, more kinds of seaweed and shellfish. They don’t have to fight the ebb and flow so much. I picked up a few seashell fragments, polished by the waves and bleached by the sun, and that was another difference: would shells survive on Cox Beach long enough to be bleached white before being swept out to sea or smashed against the rocks?

Cove

And that was it. I regret that this is only the second time I’ve been out to Tofino in almost ten years of living in Vancouver. It’s a different place, more relaxed, closer to nature. I’m not sure I could live there long-term, but I treasure the brief times I stayed. And I like to think I’ve brough something back besides souvenirs: in addition to some extra knowledge about the creatures I’ve encountered, I have a greater respect for the vast, uncaring (yet complex and endlessly fascinating) web of relationships that connect them, and me, together.

Evolution vs. Creation: War of the World Views

I confess, I’d never been to a creation/evolution debate before. Oh, I read up on a few big ones, and of course I’ve done my share of arguing on the Net. And I did attend a talk, way back when, at Ottawa U, on scientific evidence of design in nature pointing to the Biblical God. I was probably still going to church at the time, and had never read any creationist literature before, but I could already tell this twisting of science, logic and Scripture, was pure crap.

I confess, I’d never been to a creation/evolution debate before. Oh, I read up on a few big ones, and of course I’ve done my share of arguing on the Net. And I did attend a talk, way back when, at Ottawa U, on scientific evidence of design in nature pointing to the Biblical God. I was probably still going to church at the time, and had never read any creationist literature before, but I could already tell this twisting of science, logic and Scripture, was pure crap. A few years later at SFU, I went to a couple of events organized by Out on Campus, attended by a mixed group of queers and fundy Christians: “Beyond Homophobia” (a panel discussion on gay-positive Christianity), and a talk by Marc Adams on growing up gay in a fundamentalist environment. I remember it was always so easy to tell the queers from the Xians in the audience, and not just because I knew most of the former group personally. The Xian boys were just a bit too butch, and the girls just a bit too girly. Good times, good times.

So, last night was a first for me: a real formal debate (entitled “War of the World Views”), organized by the BC Skeptics with invited speaker Richard Peachy of the Creation Science Association of BC. This organisation seems to be composed of Young-Earth creationists who believe the Bible is literally true, that the Earth was created in six days just a few thousand years ago, that there was a worldwide flood, and of course that all creatures were made in their present form and can’t change. You know, I didn’t like to believe there were any full-blown creationists in Canada. I mean, that’s a US phenomenon, and aren’t we supposed to be better than the USA? Oh, sure, we’ve got some scary-ass churches out in the boonies, and our own (imported) versions of the Christian Coalition, and Campus Crusade for Christ, and… Damn. Okay, maybe we’re not so much better.

I got there about 15 minutes early, and already the auditorium (seating maybe 400) was three-quarters full. By the time the debate started it was more than full, with a bunch of people sitting in the aisles. I had fun trying to tell the skeptics from the creationists. One guy’s t-shirt a few rows in front of me caused me a bit of confusion. It read, “And God said…” followed by Maxwell’s equations, followed by “And there was light.” Ironically nerdy, or a fundy pretending to scientific literacy? The front of the t-shirt had a wireframe representation of a Black Hole with the formula for the Schwartzchild radius, which… didn’t answer the question. Oh, well.

As expected, all the creationist side had to offer was a round of pathetic attacks on evolution: some vague soundbites about mutation and natural selection being random and destructive, plus out-of-context quotes from various evolutionary scientists (Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, Niles Eldredge, Francis Crick, Martin Gardner) but no creation scientists. No positive evidence for creationism was presented, except lots of Bible verses. And it was pretty clear Peachy’s never had to debate with skeptics or scientists. All of his language, his use of the words “they” and “Evolutionists” and “Darwinists,” indicated he was only used to preaching to the choir. Later questions (mixed with some pretty heavy preaching) from creationist audience members weren’t any better, beating dead horses like polonium haloes, Darwin’s alleged racism and the perfectly fine-tuned universe… Bah. This isn’t science. It’s not even good religion. It’s nothing more than willful ignorance, and using their holy book as a security blanket against the big bad confusing world.

Scott Goodman (representing BC Skeptics) also gave an iffy presentation, though in different ways. He spoke very fast, and his tone felt a little… off-putting. I think he tried for “comedic” in a few places, but landed on “flippant, bordering on obnoxious.” Not that I’d have done much better in his place, but I had expected him to be a bit more polished since he’s dealt with creationists before. His presentation mostly discussed some general kinds of arguments used against evolutionary theory—Argument from Ignorance, Argument from Belittlement, and so on—which may not have been the best approach: skeptics would already be familiar with them, and fundies might find the whole thing condescending and tune out. He was more aware of the mixed nature of the audience, though, and made the excellent point that for most Christians, there is no conflict between their faith and science. This is something creationists need to hear, I think. Peachy said at one point, “The Bible supports ethical science for the glory of God,” or words to that effect. It’s creationists for whom this is a religious issue, it’s creationists who are on the offensive, because evolution—in their eyes—denies the glory of God.

Honestly, part of me was hoping for some crazy Xian freakshow, with brimstone and hellfire and ranting, but none of that happened. All I got was very smooth, very polite fanaticism (which actually made it even more disturbing) along with the same old arguments I’ve heard a thousand times before, from one side and the other. It was interesting to see the opposition face-to-face again after so many years, but also a bit depressing because they haven’t changed. They’re still repeating the same dogma, the same clichés, the same lies (there, I said it) and there’s no sign that’ll end anytime soon.

Did this debate accomplish anything? Well, I don’t expect any minds will be changed. Maybe it was the creationists in the audience who got the most out of it, though. I imagine it was good for them to hear some real scientific information and skeptical arguments, unfiltered by their church. Hopefully a few seeds of doubt have been planted, though it’ll probably be years (if ever) before they bear fruit. But on the bright side, if the creationists don’t listen, if they continue their crusade, at least we’ll have people like Scott Goodman and the BC Skeptics to hold the line.

DNA Songs

I’d put the Journey of Man DVD on my Xmas list, but it seems Santa didn’t think I was good enough last year. So I ordered it for myself and finally got around to watching it this cold, rainy Easter weekend.

In brief, this documentary describes an attempt to reconstruct the human family tree and trace the migrations of human populations as they left Africa fifty thousand years ago, using cutting-edge genetics—specifically, analyzing markers on the Y chromosome, taken from many thousands of men all over the planet, hence the title.

I’d put the Journey of Man DVD on my Xmas list, but it seems Santa didn’t think I was good enough last year. So I ordered it for myself and finally got around to watching it this cold, rainy Easter weekend.

In brief, this documentary describes an attempt to reconstruct the human family tree and trace the migrations of human populations as they left Africa fifty thousand years ago, using cutting-edge genetics—specifically, analyzing markers on the Y chromosome, taken from many thousands of men all over the planet, hence the title. This is ambitious. I mean, I’ve got a couple of relatives who studied the family tree, but their research only went back about three and a half centuries. But geneticist Dr. Spencer Wells (whose research this partly is, and who wrote and hosted the documentary) did more than relate a lot of facts and theories. He actually followed the paths of these migrations, enabling him, and us, to connect with these long-ago humans and understand how they were able to make this journey.

His first stop was with the San Bushmen, the oldest human branch his research has found. They’re hunter-gatherers and have been for thousands of years, using tools and skills probably not too different from their ancestors’ (though now with some metal knives and pots). Wells mentioned a quantum leap in culture between fifty and sixty thousand years ago, a relatively sudden flowering of technology, art and possibly language, that may have been one factor in some people choosing to leave Africa. But I’m guessing the droughts caused by the then-current ice age, leading to population crashes and migrations in our ancestors’ prey (and our ancestors themselves), were probably a bigger factor. Then again, what do I know? Either way, it’s almost certain that humankind’s hunting and communication skills, curiosity and adaptability, was a big factor in their survival once they left their homeland.

The first wave of migrants eventually ended up in Australia. This is where Journey of Man took us next, and we pondered the question of why they left no archeological evidence of their journey. Dr. Wells tried, and failed, to find any mention of the journey from Africa in Australian Aboriginal oral history or art (more on this later). The next stage in the journey was Central Asia. Wells and his team visited a man living in Kazakhstan, whose blood they’d sampled some years before, to tell him he’s the direct male-line descendant of the first people to move into the region 40,000 years ago. And that the genetic markers he carries in his DNA are shared with people in Europe, most of Asia, and the Americas. He looked a bit… overwhelmed. Or maybe it all went over his head. Hard to tell, really. I mean, how are you supposed to react to news like that?

After a brief trip to Pech Merle with accompanying discussion on Cro-Magnons, we were off to visit the Chukchi, nomadic reindeer herders living in northeastern Siberia. It’s a harshly beautiful land of bare snow and ice and pitiless blue sky; hard to believe people have been living there for maybe 20,000 years. But they have; the Chukchi’s survival is due not just to their amazing survival skills but also to their physical adaptations. In a cold environment, there’s evolutionary pressure to have a stouter body, with shorter limbs and extremities, to reduce surface area and limit heat loss—just as the Bushmen’s Kalahari Desert home led to tall and slim body proportions, with bare skin for efficient sweating. Evolution also explains why my European ancestors lost most of the melanin in their skin. In the higher latitudes, with Europe’s then very cold climate, having large amounts of this natural sunblock wasn’t the survival trait it used to be in Africa: with early Europeans bundled up against the cold for most of the year and the sun lower in the sky, there was less risk of skin damage but also less vitamin D being produced in their bodies. Lighter skin meant more UV rays being absorbed by the skin, which meant more vitamin D. How fascinating is that?

But beyond the science, I found Journey of Man deeply moving, because it is a story of survival against terrible odds. And humankind did more than survive: it triumphed and prospered, creating a stunning diversity of cultures and technologies with skill, courage, and probably a lot of luck. I found my perspective broadened: for example, Wells and his team had trouble crossing the border into Kazakhstan because of the war in nearby Afghanistan (the documentary was filmed in 2002). But don’t wars and borders seem terribly arbitrary and pointless when placed against a history measured in tens of thousands of years? Sounds a bit trite, maybe, but there it is. The same could be said for racial categories. I was moved almost to tears by the ending montages of smiling faces of all the people we saw in the documentary. All of them different, all of them beautifully human. All of them, you, me, and every human currently living, cousins separated by only a couple of thousand generations.

Not everybody agrees, though. As I mentioned earlier, while in Australia, Dr. Wells tried to find out if the Aborigines had any oral history mentioning the journey from Africa. One Aboriginal artist he talked to said no, that Aborigines believe they were created right here in Australia. He was quite firm in his convictions, too, saying (in so many words) that he would always believe this. Wells was diplomatic and respectful—a lot more than I would have been, in his place.

In a way, what I’d like you to think about the DNA stories we’re telling is that they are that, DNA stories. That’s our version as Europeans of how the world was populated, and where we all trace back to. That’s our songline. We use science to tell us about that because we don’t have this sense of direct continuity. Our ancestors didn’t pass down those stories. We’ve lost them, and we have to go out and find them. And we use science, which is a European way of looking at the world, to do that. You guys don’t need that.

Kudos, Spencer. I doubt I could have said that with a straight face. As much as I respect people’s rights to their faiths and traditions, I won’t play along and pretend that any culture’s mythology is as valid and useful as science in making sense of the world. Also, I’m doing pretty well without my ancestors’ songlines, thanks very much.

Near the end of the documentary Dr. Wells visited a Navajo community in Arizona, to share his research as he’d done many times before, and ran into a similar stubborn faith. What’s interesting here is that these people were clearly educated enough to understand the science—one of them said he’d already heard of Wells, which puts him one up on me… but they had their stories and were sticking to them. Even though they noticed the faces of the Central Asian people Wells visited were a mix of almost every race on the planet—a bit of African, a bit of Caucasian, a bit of East Asian—they still wouldn’t even consider that Dr. Wells’ research was correct, that maybe the Navajo’s ancestors were originally from Africa. Their only compromise (and it was a pretty smug one) was to suggest that the journey uncovered by Wells’ research and the journey described in the Navajo creation story are in fact the same event. That science was finally discovering what the Navajo people had known all along.

Which… is a bit sad. I’ve seen this kind of thing before: when faced with science, it’s tradition that has to adapt, claim common ground, back off from literalism, perform all sorts of intellectual gymnastics. But that’s a pointless struggle, because science and faith are not equivalent. They don’t speak the same language, they don’t work the same way. As the very diplomatic Dr. Wells said, “My bias as a scientist is that I like to see evidence for things.” But I don’t have to be diplomatic, so let me say that the scientific method is not a bias, it’s a tool to prevent bias. Without it, you end up with a lot of conflicting, baseless tales that stroke the listener’s ego and make one culture the centre of the universe.

With it, you get the “DNA stories.” They don’t necessarily give you comfort, a sense of purpose, or a connection with your ancestors. They don’t come with simple narratives, clear beginnings and endings; no satisfying morals or commandments from on high. But these stories describe worlds and histories far richer and more complex than any cultural myth has ever done, and can fire the imagination like nothing else. Best of all, being based on ongoing scientific research and evidence-gathering—which beats faith (no matter how sincere) and tradition (no matter how ancient)—they constantly strive towards truth. Ideally, they’ll also cause us to strive towards truth ourselves, by questioning our own biases and convictions. To quote Dr. Wells again:

Old-fashioned concepts of race are not only socially divisive, but scientifically wrong. It’s only when we’ve fully taken this on board that we can say with any conviction that the journey our ancestors launched all those years ago is complete.

Man Walking Against The Wind… OF SIN!!!

Just when I think I’ve seen everything, along comes a Web site so unique, so startling, so fucking ridiculous that I instantly feel humbled and relieved. Because there are whole dimensions of crazy and stupid out there, and if I searched for a lifetime I could only scratch the surface. Gawd bless the Internet.

Just when I think I’ve seen everything, along comes a Web site so unique, so startling, so fucking ridiculous that I instantly feel humbled and relieved. Because there are whole dimensions of crazy and stupid out there, and if I searched for a lifetime I could only scratch the surface. Gawd bless the Internet. And Gawd bless Something Awful for featuring this as an Awful Link of the Day. Okay, I’ll admit, this site isn’t of the “Let me go fetch the gentlemen in white coats” variety (for example?), but more of a “They can’t be serious, can they? Oh, I guess they can” sort of thing. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, put your hands together for (warning: Flash-heavy site):

K & K Mime Ministries

See? Isn’t that awesome? Don’t you just love the overused lightning-arc effect? The hip yet tiresome quick cuts? The flying white-gloved hands? The hilariously pretentious “I appointed them as prophets to the nations” bit? The amateurishly over-the-top echo (echo) (echo) at the end? The absolutely crappy site design?

And also: mime ministry? Seriously? Wow. Those are two words I never expected to see together. Who knew there was a demand for that?

Reeds in Space

I’ve been reading up on the Deep Impact mission to study the comet Tempel 1. You know, this is the sort of thing that gives me hope for the future, since it shows that humankind can be good at something besides killing each other or watching The Real American Bachelor Nanny or whatever the hell is on these days.

I’ve been reading up on the Deep Impact mission to study the comet Tempel 1. You know, this is the sort of thing that gives me hope for the future, since it shows that humankind can be good at something besides killing each other or watching The Real American Bachelor Nanny or whatever the hell is on these days. We’ve built machines for the sole purpose of flying into space to study a faraway heavenly body—which, okay, in this case involved blowing a hole in said heavenly body, but my point remains. Deep Impact, and missions like it, were executed to increase our knowledge, and that’s what I find truly inspirational: they’re pushing back the frontiers of ignorance, making the world a little bit richer and stranger than it was before. How could anyone not be excited?

The beauty and complexity of the natural world, as revealed by science, are a constant source of awe and wonder to me. And they put things in a healthy perspective, I think: beautiful and complex as it is, this uncaring universe does not revolve around us. It’s big, and we’re still crawling on a little rocky planet orbiting an unremarkable star in a pretty average galaxy—a microscopic dot on a microscopic dot as far as space is concerned. It’s a humbling thought but not a depressing one, because a universe designed on a human scale would be a cheap and boring place indeed. Besides, in the end what does it matter? Even if we’re not special to the universe, we are special to each other. My ego doesn’t need any more than that.

And there’s one thing we do have that’s missing from all the comets in the Solar system. I think Blaise Pascal, the 17th-century French philosopher, said it best:

Man is but a reed, the most feeble thing in nature; but he is a thinking reed. The entire universe need not arm itself to crush him. A vapor, a drop of water suffices to kill him. But, if the universe were to crush him, man would still be more noble than that which killed him, because he knows that he dies and the advantage which the universe has over him; the universe knows nothing of this.

All our dignity consists, then, in thought. By it we must elevate ourselves, and not by space and time which we cannot fill. Let us endeavor, then, to think well; this is the principle of morality.

Pascal was wrong about a lot of things, but damn was he on the money about this. This is what separates us from the universe’s mindless forces, and from other animals: not just our minds, but what we choose to do with them. The quest to improve ourselves, both personally and collectively. Striving to understand instead of just believing.

Which is why I was so disgusted when I read that a Russian astrologer was suing NASA for sending the Impactor module to smash into Tempel 1, thereby disturbing the heavens and ruining her horoscopes. I still don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Assuming this woman is only a self-deluded twit and not a fraud (which seems more likely), the sheer self-centeredness and ignorance makes the blood boil. Are we supposed to believe she ever used Tempel 1 in her horoscopes, or even knew about it before it became news? Are we supposed to be sympathetic to her cheap self-absorbed fantasies of pure and pristine celestial objects that exist only for her and her clients? Are we supposed to be excited with her visions of a solar system simple enough that she can understand it? Face it: Tempel 1’s orbit has already been disrupted at least once when it passed a bit too close to Jupiter in 1881 (and probably once more since then, I’m thinking: its current orbital period is 5.5 years, down from 6.5 years after 1881). Images of Tempel 1 clearly show several impact craters. So Ms. Marina Bai can get a grip, then bite my skinny ass, followed by shutting the fuck up. If NASA’s scientific missions disturb the voodoo babble of parasite astrologers, that’s too damn bad. They’re so quick to use a planet (like Sedna) after it’s been discovered by real scientists, but oddly enough can’t make any astronomical predictions themselves.

Sadly, the astrology business will do just fine after Deep Impact. But in my less cynical moments I like to dream that one day (hopefully not too far in the future) all that will change. While astrologers sit locked in their delusions, drawing up pretty charts, mumbling only to each other and ignored by the general populace, it is the scientists, the thinkers, the real visionaries, who will reach out and touch the stars.

“I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.”

Because, honestly: how is this billboard not shameless religious propaganda?

Oy.

before

That kind of crap really makes my blood boil, it does, and not just because I’m firmly pro-choice. Leaving aside my views for the moment, this is more evidence that the anti-choice movement was and still is driven by sectarian, dogmatic principles. Because, honestly: how is this billboard not shameless religious propaganda? It consists only of a Bible verse (actually, only part of a verse, more on that later), and is signed “God”—though that bit seems to have been plastered over by some anarchists. It’s the arrogance I cannot stand, of people who’re so sure they know the mind of (their) God; their presumption as they cheerfully insult non-Christian believers, moderate Christians, and atheists; their cowardice, as they hide behind their holy book and three-letter deity, instead of owning their positions and thinking for themselves; and their self-delusion, if they believe this particular quote has any relevance whatsoever to anyone outside of their movement.

(To be fair, this eyesore is marginally less boneheaded and blasphemous than those other “God Speaks” billboards, if only because it quotes actual Scripture instead of just making shit up and putting words in God’s mouth. The question of whether said Scripture is itself made-up shit is not one we will address at this time.)

Just for fun, let’s take a closer look at the Bible quote and see what, if anything, the hell it has to do with the abortion debate. The reference (in case it’s not clear) is Jeremiah 1:5. Here are the first five verses from Jeremiah 1 (New International Version):

1The words of Jeremiah son of Hilkiah, one of the priests at Anathoth in the territory of Benjamin.
2The word of the LORD came to him in the thirteenth year of the reign of Josiah son of Amon king of Judah,
3and through the reign of Jehoiakim son of Josiah king of Judah, down to the fifth month of the eleventh year of Zedekiah son of Josiah king of Judah, when the people of Jerusalem went into exile.
4The word of the LORD came to me, saying,
5“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.”

Seen in context, this looks more about some prophet saying how special he is, and not much about how wrong it is to abort fetuses (at least those that won’t grow up to be Old Testament prophets). So I have to wonder, why did they pick this verse? Is Jeremiah 1:5 the best Biblical support the anti-choice movement can come up with? Well, yeah, it kind of is. Good thing they had that cutesy widdle baby and teddy bear to give people warm fuzzies and distract them from the lack of message.

Because I’m feeling especially mean (and I want to show off my mad photoshopping skillz), here’s another heartwarming Bible verse. There’s lots more where those came from. Exactly why do they call it “The Good Book”?

happy

Weaver

I’ve got a new pet.

About a week ago, I noticed a big Orb Weaver spider had settled outside my living room window. It’s a beauty, a bit over 1cm long not counting the legs, with pretty patterns of brown and orange on its abdomen… and the impressive web itself, a couple of feet across, spun in the traditional spiral pattern that gives these beasties their name.

I’ve got a new pet.

About a week ago, I noticed a big Orb Weaver spider had settled outside my living room window. It’s a beauty, a bit over 1cm long not counting the legs, with pretty patterns of brown and orange on its abdomen… and the impressive web itself, a couple of feet across, spun in the traditional spiral pattern that gives these beasties their name.

Orb Weaver

I never thought I’d call a spider beautiful. Some insects are pretty: ladybugs, dragonflies, butterflies… but spiders? I don’t really have anything against them, but I guess there are too many bad connotations. Poisonous. Related to scorpions. Hallowe’en. Monster movies. This spider isn’t cute or pretty: but it is beautiful and elegant, delicately picking its way across its web—an amazing piece of engineering. No, I can’t be repulsed or afraid, since I’m pretty sure it’s not poisonous. This is a fascinating little living being, simple yet complex.

I’ve watched it take down and rebuild its web at night, a process that takes several hours. First it reabsorbed the radiating support strands one by one, spinning out a new replacement strand as it ate each one, using its rear pair of legs to guide the new webbing in place. The sticky spiral strands were torn down and it ate those too, using its third pair of legs to stuff the collapsed clumps of webbing in its mouth. Smart: its four front legs aren’t flexible enough to reach its head. Unfortunately I had to go to bed, so I missed the rest. A couple of nights before, around 1AM, I came home to find it in the last stages of rebuilding, laying out the spiral webbing from the outside in. And it does this every day, following instincts that evolution has been carving into its ancestors’ genes for tens of millions of years.

The most exciting part came Sunday afternoon. I’d gone to the window to check up on my little friend, when suddenly a fruit fly (I think) flew in the web and got stuck. Immediately the spider rushed in, grabbed the fly and—this is the best part—quickly spun a cocoon around it, twirling the fly around in its mandibles. Just like Shelob and Frodo in Return of the King. Who knew spiders did that in real life? Heh. Then it parked itself back in the centre of its web to suck out the juicy fly insides. Awesome. Just awesome. When I realized what was happening I wanted to get my camera, but the whole thing was over in less than ten seconds. I’d just read about stuff like this, and I wasn’t sure how grossed out I’d be but, really, it was pretty tame. Nothing like the half-chewed mice and baby birds our old cat would leave on the doorstep, back in the day. Interesting factoid: when it’s wrapping up prey, the spider spins out many strands at the same time, whereas when it’s building its web, there’s only one single strand.

I still wonder how much food it’s getting, though. My first thought was that it didn’t seem like a great location (since the web is mostly parallel to my window), but what do I know? Still, can it move, if it finds the pickings too slim? It should, shouldn’t it? That web isn’t like a hive: if it needs to, the spider can just abandon it and walk away… right? I mean, how else did it get here? Or did it fly in as a young on a little webbing parachute? Do Orb Weavers do that? (Not a simple question: that term covers lots of different species). But this one already looks mature… Just how long has it been here, anyways? I’ve suddenly got all these questions because it’s not abstract anymore. There’s so much I don’t know about this little creature, and I do plan to get better informed. Meantime, I feel privileged to have a front-row seat to its life.